Friday, October 31, 2014

Political and Philosophical: World Peace (Sort Of)


I came to the realization the other day that despite all the armed conflicts going on in the world at the moment, we are probably closer to world peace right now than at any other time I can think of.


I don't dispute there is still a lot of fighting going on. There are countless military insurrections going on at all times in Africa, and have been without stopping since the end of the colonial era. The International War on Terror continues unabated for 13 years now. The new outbreak between Russia and Ukraine is slowly but surely still continuing. Of course, Israel is still at war with every other country in the area, but like the African insurrections that's nothing new.


What's striking is that only two of those – the Russian/Ukrainian conflict and the continuing siege of Israel are really the only two conflicts going on in the world right now that fit the traditional definition of a war. They are the only cases where one state, with an organized government, recognized borders, etc. is fighting militarily with another (or several) state(s). That deserves some recognition.


We're mostly focused on the War on Terror here in the US because that's the one that has most of our soldiers in it. Although, as I'll come to in a minute, even that is nearing its end. Because we have so many soldiers deployed in combat zones right now, it takes a little bit of looking at it to realize that we aren't fighting the sort of war we have been up until about 20 years ago. What I mean is that we aren't fighting local governments, but alongside them. Our troops are being quartered in their country, with their cooperation, to fight a common enemy within their own populace. We aren't so much fighting a war, at least in the sense of the World Wars, Cold War, Spanish-American War, etc. as we are aiding an existing government fighting its own rebels. And we're doing it in more of a mercenary capacity than we have in the past – we're helping them because the defeat of their rebels is as good for our country as it is for theirs. The fact that the rebels are terrorists and hate us in particular doesn't change the underlying fact that our enemy is in fact the enemy of the country they're fighting from, which means our soldiers aren't so much invading and occupying as they are assisting.


This difference may not seem like much in a practical sense, and it may not be. The risk of death and injury is pretty much the same no matter what your enemy calls themselves if they have the same weapons, tactics, and training as organized armies we've fought in the past. But from an economic and diplomatic standpoint, what's going on right now is hugely different from anything the world has ever seen before. The two continuous sort of conflicts, the insurrections we're not involved in and the situation in Israel, aren't new. There are no new strategies or tactics or weapons or anything else to be tried, it seems. The Russian invasion has dropped out of the news altogether, because no matter how they want to spin it Russia looks like the villain here and they have not got a single ally in the world on their side, and at least 10 countries ready to fight them if they don't back down. Anyone with any sense will realize that it's suicide to go to war against the entire rest of the planet over a little stretch of land that is just as accessible in someone else's hands as in yours.


What's more, the fighting the US is doing in the War on Terror is beginning to decline, and it's because of something that's being maligned here at home as sinister and downright scary. Drone warfare is about to abolish something that's existed for thousands of years. People have always said that you will never be able to replace the human soldiers in fighting, but experience is showing that is no longer true either. People (mostly right wingers) are even complaining about the harm being done (mostly by Obama) in killing jobs and cutting the funding for the military, but they're ignoring the fact that the funds are being cut because costs are being cut. Ships are replacing complicated missile defenses with lasers and rail guns that cost thousands instead of millions to build and use. And the all-important ground troop is at last becoming obsolete.


It's a wonder the spin doctors haven't pointed out the fact that soldiers and military personnel may lose their jobs, but only because the whole idea of Americans dying on the battlefield is about to become a thing of the past. We're staring at not a future but present situation where military graveyards are no longer going to have new graves dug in them. The victory that represents is singular; it has never happened before; we're the only country in the world that can claim it at the moment; and we don't seem to realize just how much we have won.


Our economy tends to thrive in war, but for the past decade of this pseudo-war it hasn't been doing well. The reason is that it really isn't a war-time economy. It's a peace-time economy. We're making goods and services for our own consumption and export. The manufacture of planes and bombs and the training of soldiers, that's all continuing at its normal peace-time pace. Things are even being built faster than they're being used at the moment, which is why military units are disbanding as well. Back home our local artillery unit, again technically DURING WAR was sent home to stay because there's no work for them to do.


The Bible says there will always be war, or at least rumor of war. But we ought to notice and to celebrate that there has never before been so much rumor and so little to talk about.